<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Safari for Windows, 0day exploit in 2 hours</title>
	<atom:link href="http://larholm.com/2007/06/12/safari-for-windows-0day-exploit-in-2-hours/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://larholm.com/2007/06/12/safari-for-windows-0day-exploit-in-2-hours/</link>
	<description>Me, myself and I</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 19:55:58 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: fun love test for a couple to take free</title>
		<link>http://larholm.com/2007/06/12/safari-for-windows-0day-exploit-in-2-hours/#comment-27257</link>
		<dc:creator>fun love test for a couple to take free</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 17:09:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://test.larholm.com/?p=14#comment-27257</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;fun love test for a couple to take free...&lt;/strong&gt;

I am thinking of doing a blog, how many times a week do you think I should post?...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>fun love test for a couple to take free&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>I am thinking of doing a blog, how many times a week do you think I should post?&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Larholm.com - Me, myself and I &#187; Silverlight 1.0 Release Candidate</title>
		<link>http://larholm.com/2007/06/12/safari-for-windows-0day-exploit-in-2-hours/#comment-2274</link>
		<dc:creator>Larholm.com - Me, myself and I &#187; Silverlight 1.0 Release Candidate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2007 16:40:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://test.larholm.com/?p=14#comment-2274</guid>
		<description>[...] speaking, this has not been a threat to a lot of people. Unlike the Safari 3.0 release for Windows, which received millions of end user installations after being featured [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] speaking, this has not been a threat to a lot of people. Unlike the Safari 3.0 release for Windows, which received millions of end user installations after being featured [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Browser Wars: Internet Explorer continues to Lose Share to Firefox, What&#8217;s Safari? &#124; The Marketing Technology Blog</title>
		<link>http://larholm.com/2007/06/12/safari-for-windows-0day-exploit-in-2-hours/#comment-1967</link>
		<dc:creator>Browser Wars: Internet Explorer continues to Lose Share to Firefox, What&#8217;s Safari? &#124; The Marketing Technology Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2007 01:48:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://test.larholm.com/?p=14#comment-1967</guid>
		<description>[...] Safari hasn&#8217;t even made any impact, even with its attempt to push into the Windows market. Perhaps part of Safari&#8217;s problems are the immediate and embarrassing security issues that were uncovered within 2 hours of it&#8217;s download by Lar Holm. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Safari hasn&#8217;t even made any impact, even with its attempt to push into the Windows market. Perhaps part of Safari&#8217;s problems are the immediate and embarrassing security issues that were uncovered within 2 hours of it&#8217;s download by Lar Holm. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GeekBrief.TV &#124; Video Podcast &#187; Archive &#187; GBTV #0182 &#124; GeekBrief.TV</title>
		<link>http://larholm.com/2007/06/12/safari-for-windows-0day-exploit-in-2-hours/#comment-1567</link>
		<dc:creator>GeekBrief.TV &#124; Video Podcast &#187; Archive &#187; GBTV #0182 &#124; GeekBrief.TV</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2007 18:19:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://test.larholm.com/?p=14#comment-1567</guid>
		<description>[...] Safari for Windows, 0day exploit in 2 hours Source: Larholm.com [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Safari for Windows, 0day exploit in 2 hours Source: Larholm.com [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: More Mozilla Security Flaws!! at M and L Adventures</title>
		<link>http://larholm.com/2007/06/12/safari-for-windows-0day-exploit-in-2-hours/#comment-1343</link>
		<dc:creator>More Mozilla Security Flaws!! at M and L Adventures</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2007 10:55:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://test.larholm.com/?p=14#comment-1343</guid>
		<description>[...] on this one, don&#8217;t think Safari doesn&#8217;t suffer from similar problems with security. Larholm.com found a security vulnerability in Safari 3 for Windows within 2 hours of it being launched by Apple [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] on this one, don&#8217;t think Safari doesn&#8217;t suffer from similar problems with security. Larholm.com found a security vulnerability in Safari 3 for Windows within 2 hours of it being launched by Apple [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Safari pentru Windows - vulnerabil ? &#124; ikon media factory</title>
		<link>http://larholm.com/2007/06/12/safari-for-windows-0day-exploit-in-2-hours/#comment-1046</link>
		<dc:creator>Safari pentru Windows - vulnerabil ? &#124; ikon media factory</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2007 23:16:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://test.larholm.com/?p=14#comment-1046</guid>
		<description>[...] danez Thor Larholm a fost printre cei care au raportat o problem? în nou? versiune a Safari. Acesta sus?ine c? a [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] danez Thor Larholm a fost printre cei care au raportat o problem? în nou? versiune a Safari. Acesta sus?ine c? a [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Safarin pentru Windows &#124; ikon media factory</title>
		<link>http://larholm.com/2007/06/12/safari-for-windows-0day-exploit-in-2-hours/#comment-1045</link>
		<dc:creator>Safarin pentru Windows &#124; ikon media factory</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2007 22:33:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://test.larholm.com/?p=14#comment-1045</guid>
		<description>[...] danez Thor Larholm a fost printre cei care au raportat o problem? în nou? versiune a Safari. Acesta sus?ine c? a [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] danez Thor Larholm a fost printre cei care au raportat o problem? în nou? versiune a Safari. Acesta sus?ine c? a [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Random Reader</title>
		<link>http://larholm.com/2007/06/12/safari-for-windows-0day-exploit-in-2-hours/#comment-1023</link>
		<dc:creator>Random Reader</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2007 02:02:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://test.larholm.com/?p=14#comment-1023</guid>
		<description>I just came back to this because I discovered, during the recent buzz over the same kind of issue in IE in Firefox, that URIs passed to protocol handlers are actually &lt;a href="http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa767914.aspx" rel="nofollow"&gt;&lt;i&gt;meant&lt;/i&gt; to be unescaped&lt;/a&gt;.

So my previous conclusion in comment #135 is wrong: this issue is (was) squarely on Firefox!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just came back to this because I discovered, during the recent buzz over the same kind of issue in IE in Firefox, that URIs passed to protocol handlers are actually <a href="http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa767914.aspx" rel="nofollow"><i>meant</i> to be unescaped</a>.</p>
<p>So my previous conclusion in comment #135 is wrong: this issue is (was) squarely on Firefox!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Not for the Faint of Heart: Multiple 0-Day Exploits Affecting Firefox, IE, Netscape, and Trillian &#124; Server software</title>
		<link>http://larholm.com/2007/06/12/safari-for-windows-0day-exploit-in-2-hours/#comment-831</link>
		<dc:creator>Not for the Faint of Heart: Multiple 0-Day Exploits Affecting Firefox, IE, Netscape, and Trillian &#124; Server software</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jul 2007 03:44:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://test.larholm.com/?p=14#comment-831</guid>
		<description>[...] Thor&#8217;s post on Safari (windows) 0-day caused by improper URI handling [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Thor&#8217;s post on Safari (windows) 0-day caused by improper URI handling [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Firefox critical security vulnerabilty &#171; Computer newsletter and security information</title>
		<link>http://larholm.com/2007/06/12/safari-for-windows-0day-exploit-in-2-hours/#comment-645</link>
		<dc:creator>Firefox critical security vulnerabilty &#171; Computer newsletter and security information</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2007 04:40:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://test.larholm.com/?p=14#comment-645</guid>
		<description>[...] the zero-day exploit of Safari for Windows noted last month and also discussed at MacOSXHints, the breach deals with a ‘URL handler‘, which allows the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the zero-day exploit of Safari for Windows noted last month and also discussed at MacOSXHints, the breach deals with a ‘URL handler‘, which allows the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
