<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Firefox fixes Internet Explorer flaw</title>
	<atom:link href="http://larholm.com/2007/07/18/firefox-fixes-internet-explorer-flaw/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://larholm.com/2007/07/18/firefox-fixes-internet-explorer-flaw/</link>
	<description>Me, myself and I</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Jun 2010 16:30:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Sodni Prevodi</title>
		<link>http://larholm.com/2007/07/18/firefox-fixes-internet-explorer-flaw/comment-page-1/#comment-56848</link>
		<dc:creator>Sodni Prevodi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 18:09:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://larholm.com/2007/07/18/firefox-fixes-internet-explorer-flaw/#comment-56848</guid>
		<description>Reading it too late :(
I allready use FF3 :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reading it too late <img src='http://larholm.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
I allready use FF3 <img src='http://larholm.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: B?ad w Firefox, nieprawid?owe filtrowanie wyra?e? w linkach. &#124; tPython</title>
		<link>http://larholm.com/2007/07/18/firefox-fixes-internet-explorer-flaw/comment-page-1/#comment-1121</link>
		<dc:creator>B?ad w Firefox, nieprawid?owe filtrowanie wyra?e? w linkach. &#124; tPython</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2007 13:56:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://larholm.com/2007/07/18/firefox-fixes-internet-explorer-flaw/#comment-1121</guid>
		<description>[...] Foundation poprawi?a b??d wraz z wersj? 2.0.0.5, problem po stronie IE zosta? po raz kolejny zignorowany (wprawdzie w tym przypadku jest to cz??ciowo zrozumia?e, gdy? przecie? istnieje mo?liwo??, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Foundation poprawi?a b??d wraz z wersj? 2.0.0.5, problem po stronie IE zosta? po raz kolejny zignorowany (wprawdzie w tym przypadku jest to cz??ciowo zrozumia?e, gdy? przecie? istnieje mo?liwo??, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Attack of the URL Vulnerabilities &#124; GNUCITIZEN</title>
		<link>http://larholm.com/2007/07/18/firefox-fixes-internet-explorer-flaw/comment-page-1/#comment-1076</link>
		<dc:creator>Attack of the URL Vulnerabilities &#124; GNUCITIZEN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2007 09:53:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://larholm.com/2007/07/18/firefox-fixes-internet-explorer-flaw/#comment-1076</guid>
		<description>[...] related to the infamous bugs that has been recently discussed on multiple blogs including GC (us), Thor Larholm&#8217;s blog, Mozilla&#8217;s Security Blog, the 0&#215;000000 hack zine and Billy (BK) Rios&#8216; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] related to the infamous bugs that has been recently discussed on multiple blogs including GC (us), Thor Larholm&#8217;s blog, Mozilla&#8217;s Security Blog, the 0&#215;000000 hack zine and Billy (BK) Rios&#8216; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Larholm.com - Me, myself and I &#187; SeaMonkey suite affected by URL vulnerability</title>
		<link>http://larholm.com/2007/07/18/firefox-fixes-internet-explorer-flaw/comment-page-1/#comment-1034</link>
		<dc:creator>Larholm.com - Me, myself and I &#187; SeaMonkey suite affected by URL vulnerability</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2007 15:12:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://larholm.com/2007/07/18/firefox-fixes-internet-explorer-flaw/#comment-1034</guid>
		<description>[...] Firefox fixes Internet Explorer flaw  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Firefox fixes Internet Explorer flaw  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thor Larholm</title>
		<link>http://larholm.com/2007/07/18/firefox-fixes-internet-explorer-flaw/comment-page-1/#comment-982</link>
		<dc:creator>Thor Larholm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2007 18:34:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://larholm.com/2007/07/18/firefox-fixes-internet-explorer-flaw/#comment-982</guid>
		<description>Biju, SeaMonkey should be affected as well as it registers a similar URL protocol handler, called SeaMonkeyURL. The definition can be found at &lt;a href=&quot;http://lxr.mozilla.org/seamonkey/source/suite/installer/windows/nsis/shared.nsh#157&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://lxr.mozilla.org/seamonkey/source/suite/installer/windows/nsis/shared.nsh#157&lt;/a&gt;

The fix in Firefox 2.0.0.5 prevents any kind of additional arguments from being parsed if Firefox is launched as a URL protocol handler. Other applications can still be called with arbitrary arguments.

Regards
Thor Larholm</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Biju, SeaMonkey should be affected as well as it registers a similar URL protocol handler, called SeaMonkeyURL. The definition can be found at <a href="http://lxr.mozilla.org/seamonkey/source/suite/installer/windows/nsis/shared.nsh#157" rel="nofollow">http://lxr.mozilla.org/seamonkey/source/suite/installer/windows/nsis/shared.nsh#157</a></p>
<p>The fix in Firefox 2.0.0.5 prevents any kind of additional arguments from being parsed if Firefox is launched as a URL protocol handler. Other applications can still be called with arbitrary arguments.</p>
<p>Regards<br />
Thor Larholm</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Symantec gives its ThreatCon a makeover &#8212; Security Bytes</title>
		<link>http://larholm.com/2007/07/18/firefox-fixes-internet-explorer-flaw/comment-page-1/#comment-973</link>
		<dc:creator>Symantec gives its ThreatCon a makeover &#8212; Security Bytes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2007 09:33:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://larholm.com/2007/07/18/firefox-fixes-internet-explorer-flaw/#comment-973</guid>
		<description>[...] Thor Larholm, one of the researchers who brought this problem to light, says in his Larhom.com blog that the Firefox update isn&#8217;t the end of the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Thor Larholm, one of the researchers who brought this problem to light, says in his Larhom.com blog that the Firefox update isn&#8217;t the end of the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Biju</title>
		<link>http://larholm.com/2007/07/18/firefox-fixes-internet-explorer-flaw/comment-page-1/#comment-966</link>
		<dc:creator>Biju</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2007 04:19:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://larholm.com/2007/07/18/firefox-fixes-internet-explorer-flaw/#comment-966</guid>
		<description>Thor,

1. I dont see SeaMonkey and other moz products mentioned, whether they are also affected?

2. your example show attack vector with javascript:, whether current firefox fix also stops chrome://, file://, jar://, resource:// being called?

3. what about target apps that registers scp:// ftp:// ssh:// protocals, ie apps like PuTTY, WinSCP, FileZilla, as well as P2P apps. any report them being tested for similar possible attack.

Thanks...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thor,</p>
<p>1. I dont see SeaMonkey and other moz products mentioned, whether they are also affected?</p>
<p>2. your example show attack vector with javascript:, whether current firefox fix also stops chrome://, file://, jar://, resource:// being called?</p>
<p>3. what about target apps that registers scp:// ftp:// ssh:// protocals, ie apps like PuTTY, WinSCP, FileZilla, as well as P2P apps. any report them being tested for similar possible attack.</p>
<p>Thanks&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Harry Johnston</title>
		<link>http://larholm.com/2007/07/18/firefox-fixes-internet-explorer-flaw/comment-page-1/#comment-962</link>
		<dc:creator>Harry Johnston</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2007 00:14:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://larholm.com/2007/07/18/firefox-fixes-internet-explorer-flaw/#comment-962</guid>
		<description>I can&#039;t claim to be an expert on ActiveX; I was basing my (apparently erroneous) assumption on the number of vulnerability notices I&#039;ve read over the years that seemed to boil down to an ActiveX component being inappropriately exposed to web sites.  (For one thing, there was hardly a cumulative IE update that didn&#039;t set the kill bit for at least one control!)

I&#039;ll accept that my statement was technically incorrect; however, it still seems that it is too easy (in practice) for software to expose an ActiveX control to the web without meaning to?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t claim to be an expert on ActiveX; I was basing my (apparently erroneous) assumption on the number of vulnerability notices I&#8217;ve read over the years that seemed to boil down to an ActiveX component being inappropriately exposed to web sites.  (For one thing, there was hardly a cumulative IE update that didn&#8217;t set the kill bit for at least one control!)</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll accept that my statement was technically incorrect; however, it still seems that it is too easy (in practice) for software to expose an ActiveX control to the web without meaning to?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: foxiewire.com</title>
		<link>http://larholm.com/2007/07/18/firefox-fixes-internet-explorer-flaw/comment-page-1/#comment-955</link>
		<dc:creator>foxiewire.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jul 2007 19:55:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://larholm.com/2007/07/18/firefox-fixes-internet-explorer-flaw/#comment-955</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Larholm.com - Me, myself and I			 » Firefox fixes Internet Explorer flaw...&lt;/strong&gt;

Mozilla has just released Firefox 2.0.0.5 which purportedly fixes one of the attack vectors of the Internet Explorer input validation flaw that I previously detailed. I will go on the record as stating that this does not actually fix the flaw in Intern...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Larholm.com &#8211; Me, myself and I			 » Firefox fixes Internet Explorer flaw&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Mozilla has just released Firefox 2.0.0.5 which purportedly fixes one of the attack vectors of the Internet Explorer input validation flaw that I previously detailed. I will go on the record as stating that this does not actually fix the flaw in Intern&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thor Larholm</title>
		<link>http://larholm.com/2007/07/18/firefox-fixes-internet-explorer-flaw/comment-page-1/#comment-938</link>
		<dc:creator>Thor Larholm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jul 2007 10:05:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://larholm.com/2007/07/18/firefox-fixes-internet-explorer-flaw/#comment-938</guid>
		<description>Kimblim, I mean both :)

Regards
Thor Larholm</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kimblim, I mean both <img src='http://larholm.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Regards<br />
Thor Larholm</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.352 seconds -->
