<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Larholm.com</title>
	<atom:link href="http://larholm.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://larholm.com</link>
	<description>Me, myself and I</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 19:56:06 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Safari for Windows, 0day exploit in 2 hours by fun love test for a couple to take free</title>
		<link>http://larholm.com/2007/06/12/safari-for-windows-0day-exploit-in-2-hours/#comment-27257</link>
		<dc:creator>fun love test for a couple to take free</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 17:09:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://test.larholm.com/?p=14#comment-27257</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;fun love test for a couple to take free...&lt;/strong&gt;

I am thinking of doing a blog, how many times a week do you think I should post?...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>fun love test for a couple to take free&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>I am thinking of doing a blog, how many times a week do you think I should post?&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on QuickTime qtnext 0day for IE by Antonio Trigiani w3bL0g - Informatica Virale &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Vulnerabilità per adobe e secondlife da gnucitizen</title>
		<link>http://larholm.com/2007/09/19/quicktime-qtnext-0day-for-ie/#comment-3529</link>
		<dc:creator>Antonio Trigiani w3bL0g - Informatica Virale &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Vulnerabilità per adobe e secondlife da gnucitizen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2007 03:07:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://larholm.com/2007/09/19/quicktime-qtnext-0day-for-ie/#comment-3529</guid>
		<description>[...] segnala anche uno 0-day per quicktime.      Segnala su        Segnala su: &#160;&#124;&#160; &#160;&#124;&#160;  &#160;&#124;&#160; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] segnala anche uno 0-day per quicktime.      Segnala su        Segnala su: &nbsp;|&nbsp; &nbsp;|&nbsp;  &nbsp;|&nbsp; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on QuickTime qtnext 0day for IE by Tim Said What? &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Critical Zero-Day PDF Bug Compromises Windows PCs</title>
		<link>http://larholm.com/2007/09/19/quicktime-qtnext-0day-for-ie/#comment-3445</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Said What? &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Critical Zero-Day PDF Bug Compromises Windows PCs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2007 13:46:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://larholm.com/2007/09/19/quicktime-qtnext-0day-for-ie/#comment-3445</guid>
		<description>[...] still be used to compromise Internet Explorer, as security researcher Thor Larholm demonstrated in a posting on Sept. 19. Apple hasn&#8217;t yet released any details on the status of a QuickTime [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] still be used to compromise Internet Explorer, as security researcher Thor Larholm demonstrated in a posting on Sept. 19. Apple hasn&#8217;t yet released any details on the status of a QuickTime [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on QuickTime qtnext 0day for IE by Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://larholm.com/2007/09/19/quicktime-qtnext-0day-for-ie/#comment-3317</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2007 13:38:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://larholm.com/2007/09/19/quicktime-qtnext-0day-for-ie/#comment-3317</guid>
		<description>Thor,

What about using C:\windows\system32\cmd.exe .. it has a colon after all...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thor,</p>
<p>What about using C:\windows\system32\cmd.exe .. it has a colon after all&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on QuickTime qtnext 0day for IE by DigitMemo.com &#187; Critical Zero-Day PDF Bug Compromises Windows PCs</title>
		<link>http://larholm.com/2007/09/19/quicktime-qtnext-0day-for-ie/#comment-3297</link>
		<dc:creator>DigitMemo.com &#187; Critical Zero-Day PDF Bug Compromises Windows PCs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2007 05:22:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://larholm.com/2007/09/19/quicktime-qtnext-0day-for-ie/#comment-3297</guid>
		<description>[...] still be used to compromise Internet Explorer, as security researcher Thor Larholm demonstrated in a posting on Sept. 19. Apple hasn&#8217;t yet released any details on the status of a QuickTime [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] still be used to compromise Internet Explorer, as security researcher Thor Larholm demonstrated in a posting on Sept. 19. Apple hasn&#8217;t yet released any details on the status of a QuickTime [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on QuickTime qtnext 0day for IE by Security and Development blog &#187; Ejecución de código vía Internet Explorer y QuickTime</title>
		<link>http://larholm.com/2007/09/19/quicktime-qtnext-0day-for-ie/#comment-3271</link>
		<dc:creator>Security and Development blog &#187; Ejecución de código vía Internet Explorer y QuickTime</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2007 14:32:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://larholm.com/2007/09/19/quicktime-qtnext-0day-for-ie/#comment-3271</guid>
		<description>[...] QuickTime qtnext 0day for IE http://larholm.com/2007/09/19/quicktime-qtnext-0day-for-ie/ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] QuickTime qtnext 0day for IE <a href="http://larholm.com/2007/09/19/quicktime-qtnext-0day-for-ie/" rel="nofollow">http://larholm.com/2007/09/19/quicktime-qtnext-0day-for-ie/</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Safari for Windows, 0day exploit in 2 hours by Larholm.com - Me, myself and I &#187; Silverlight 1.0 Release Candidate</title>
		<link>http://larholm.com/2007/06/12/safari-for-windows-0day-exploit-in-2-hours/#comment-2274</link>
		<dc:creator>Larholm.com - Me, myself and I &#187; Silverlight 1.0 Release Candidate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2007 16:40:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://test.larholm.com/?p=14#comment-2274</guid>
		<description>[...] speaking, this has not been a threat to a lot of people. Unlike the Safari 3.0 release for Windows, which received millions of end user installations after being featured [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] speaking, this has not been a threat to a lot of people. Unlike the Safari 3.0 release for Windows, which received millions of end user installations after being featured [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Safari for Windows, 0day exploit in 2 hours by Browser Wars: Internet Explorer continues to Lose Share to Firefox, What&#8217;s Safari? &#124; The Marketing Technology Blog</title>
		<link>http://larholm.com/2007/06/12/safari-for-windows-0day-exploit-in-2-hours/#comment-1967</link>
		<dc:creator>Browser Wars: Internet Explorer continues to Lose Share to Firefox, What&#8217;s Safari? &#124; The Marketing Technology Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2007 01:48:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://test.larholm.com/?p=14#comment-1967</guid>
		<description>[...] Safari hasn&#8217;t even made any impact, even with its attempt to push into the Windows market. Perhaps part of Safari&#8217;s problems are the immediate and embarrassing security issues that were uncovered within 2 hours of it&#8217;s download by Lar Holm. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Safari hasn&#8217;t even made any impact, even with its attempt to push into the Windows market. Perhaps part of Safari&#8217;s problems are the immediate and embarrassing security issues that were uncovered within 2 hours of it&#8217;s download by Lar Holm. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Internet Explorer 0day Exploit by Techzi &#187; Blog Archive &#187; New URI browser flaws worse than first thought</title>
		<link>http://larholm.com/2007/07/10/internet-explorer-0day-exploit/#comment-1715</link>
		<dc:creator>Techzi &#187; Blog Archive &#187; New URI browser flaws worse than first thought</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Aug 2007 20:12:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://larholm.com/2007/07/10/internet-explorer-0day-exploit/#comment-1715</guid>
		<description>[...] bugs have become a hot topic over the past month ever since researcher Thor Larholm showed how a browser could be tricked into sending malformed data to Firefox using this technology. This bug allowed an attacker to run unauthorized software on a [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] bugs have become a hot topic over the past month ever since researcher Thor Larholm showed how a browser could be tricked into sending malformed data to Firefox using this technology. This bug allowed an attacker to run unauthorized software on a [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Internet Explorer 0day Exploit by New URI browser flaws worse than first thought</title>
		<link>http://larholm.com/2007/07/10/internet-explorer-0day-exploit/#comment-1714</link>
		<dc:creator>New URI browser flaws worse than first thought</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Aug 2007 20:00:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://larholm.com/2007/07/10/internet-explorer-0day-exploit/#comment-1714</guid>
		<description>[...] bugs have become a hot topic over the past month ever since researcher Thor Larholm showed how a browser could be tricked into sending malformed data to Firefox using this technology. This bug allowed an attacker to run unauthorized software on a [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] bugs have become a hot topic over the past month ever since researcher Thor Larholm showed how a browser could be tricked into sending malformed data to Firefox using this technology. This bug allowed an attacker to run unauthorized software on a [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
